I sure would concur with Bob.
Digital photography has given us vastly expanded options and allows the
production of some amazing work.
Roy Inman
Roy and all:
I am a newspaper photographer using digital cameras. I agree, but with a
major qualification--it depends on the camera! We used Nikon film cameras
for more than 40 years, and they were great. When we went to digital, we
bought Nikon mainly because we had a jillion Nikon lenses. We had D1, D1H,
and D2H models. They were all s**t. I thought digital was s**t, based on
our Nikons. They broke very often, for no reason. When they "worked", the
"grey scale" was non-existant. If you had detail in highlights, the shadows
were gone. And vice-versa. Yet the mid tones were extremely flat. They
ate batteries so fast I carried an inverter and charger in my car. The
flash was hit-or-miss, mainly miss.
We borrowed some Canon equipment and tested it. No comparison! Night and
day! There is a good contrast range, mine haven't haven't died yet, the
flash works, and I charge batteries every 3 or 4 weeks.
Tom Busler
Hernando MS
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
