--- In [email protected], "Jim King" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
to me, it seems easier to update PARTS of a web site on a more
> frequent basis (ala Proto 48) . maybe bi-weekly? . than having to
wait til
> the editor has enough material to justify running an ENTIRE issue .
twice a
> year (maybe). Sure there will be those that have no access to on-
line
> services and won't take the time to visit the library for their free
> services either, but those are not the ones we should target
anyway. I
> don't want to sound insensitive but time marches on with or without
our
> input. If you don't want to get left behind, sometimes, we have to
make the
> move to keep up.
>
>
>
> Jim King
>
> Smoky Mountain Model Works, Inc.
>
> www.smokymountainmodelworks.com
>
It is also easier to produce articles for the web. My articles on my
website only require taking pictures, editing them and adding
captions. I can do this in about two hours. An article for a magazine
requires additional "folksy" crap to make the reader feel warm an
fuzzy, this adds at least 4-5 hours. The web requirements for photos
becomes much less than print, my original articles were done with a
2.2 meg camera. Print editors are always whining about photo quality.
S scale should move into the 21st century, maybe more people would
join in if it didn't appear to be a sanctuary of old f**ts.
Harold
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
