Dear Jim,
   I sent letters to Sunset (Mort Mann?) with a list of the models OMI produced 
with code 110 wheelsets.  But, they decided to use the NMRA standards.  One 
argument we posed was that you could not build a layout to the NMRA standards 
as they were not supported with a currently available NMRA track gage.  I think 
by then we had Wayne Pier's NASG milled gages.  
  Of course the first models with code 110 wheels was the NASG ACF covered 
hoppers.  Jim led that committee to start the code 110 ball rolling.
   A funny twist is the S Scale company that currently  produces items using 
code 125 wheels gaged to the NASG standards.  And, I do not think anyone has 
noticed this odd combination.
Best,
Don

 

    
            
--- In [email protected], "Bill Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The S Scale Sunset UP Big Boy was built back in the day to the NMRA S 
Scale wheel gauge. The NASG soon thereafter approved a slightly  
different set of standards. <SNIP>

Bill:
Just a minor point of clarification...  The NASG standards were adopted 
in 1981, I think the Big Boy came a few years after (1983?).  Overland 
also built their first S scale model, the SD40-2, in 1983 using the 
NMRA wheel standards.  

Don Thompson and Wayne Pier did a lot of "proselytizing" with each new 
manufacturer/ builder to have subsequent models built to the NASG 
dimensions.  I know OMI did; I have no recollection as to how Sunset 
responded.

Jim K.  

              

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to