and he notes -
Isn't that what I already asked
Raleigh in Maine
At 07:31 PM 9/12/2008, ed_loizeaux wrote:
> > I'd like to request that this vote be modified
> > to make the "Combination"
> > option(s) more specific, as in:
> > 1. Kadee #s 802/808 and Sergent
> > 2. Kadee # 5 and Sergent
> > John Degnan
>
>I'd suggest the question: "Which coupler would you prefer to use as
>your primary coupler in the future?" if this is for use by a potential
>manufacturer. If for historical perspective, then the question: "Which
>is the coupler most used on your equipment?" might be better. On the
>other hand, a more accurate analysis could be obtained with the
>question: "What is the exact number of each coupler type you are
>currently using?" So the best question sort of depends on what the
>purpose of the survey is -- which we still do not know. Cheers...Ed L.
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
