Sorry Ed but the NASG website still shows the old RPs :(
On Aug 8, 2011, at 6:50 PM, John Degnan wrote: > With what Bill wrote (see below) in mind, here is an excerpt from a > recent conversation I had with Ed McCamey about a recent change at > the NASG and/or NMRA concerning this matter. How does this affect > what Bill wrote below (if at all)? : > >>> You would essentially use the old RP3 and RP4 specifications (now in >>> the S3.1 and S4.1 as fine options) with adjusting for the check >>> gauges >>> to fit the S gauge. The NASG has recently dropped the older use of >>> code 88 for the "Proto" use and adopted the NMRA code 87 for Proto: >>> 64. >>> I'd recommend you use standard S scale check gauge - but construct >>> turnout flangeways in the frog to 0.042" maximum. > > John Degnan > [email protected] Talmadge C 'TC' Carr Sn42 and Hn42 somewhere in the wilds of the Pacific Northwest [email protected] ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
