Australia struggled with three national gauges,narrow, standard, and broad 
(Irish) which at 1600 millimetres is five feet-three inches.  I had a chance to 
see  the broad gauge equipment when visiting the Australian National Rail 
Museum in Adelaide last year.  I can tell you that standing on the ground 
beside the broad gauge equipment, that track gauge looks r-e-a-l-l-y wide.  I 
felt like an O scale figure standing next to inch-and-a-quarter track.

Jim Martin


________________________________
 From: Andre Ming <[email protected]>
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Monday, September 3, 2012 9:44:26 AM
Subject: Re: {S-Scale List} Re: A Blessing and A Curse
 

  
Bill 
said:
 
Andre, you work 
for a railroad, don’t you? Isn’t standard gauge 4ft 8-1/2in? If so, O gauge (at 
5ft) is merely 3-1/2 scale inches too wide. 

No wonder we've been derailing lately.
 
Ah well... brain farts happen.  (I thought O 
gauge rail was wider than that.)
 
 
Andre Ming
 
 
----- Original Message ----- 
>From: Bill Roberts 
>To: S Scale 
>Sent: Monday, September 03, 2012 1:25  AM
>Subject: {S-Scale List} Re: A Blessing  and A Curse
>
>> Sun Sep  2, 2012 11:26 am (PDT) . Posted by:"Andre Ming” fox36x
>> 
>>> 
  Sun Sep 2, 2012 8:37 am (PDT) . Posted by:"John Albee” johnalbee03
>>> 
>>> The other point regarding 2 rail O "scale" is that it is 5ft 
  broad gauge.
>>> Always bothered me.
>> 
>> I understand 
  completely. It's only 6" too wide, but an O scale model just doesn't look 
  "right" on the wide track. The proportion is off by a half-foot... and it IS 
  noticeable to some. . .
>
>
>I do agree that O scale just doesn't look 
  “right”.
>-- 
>Bill Roberts, Receiver
>San Antonio & Aransas Pass 
  Railway Co.
>
>* * * Notice to travelers * * *
>
>Unattended children 
  will be given an expresso and a free 
  puppy.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>------------------------------------
>
>Yahoo! 
  Groups Links
>
>
  Traditional
>
>    
  (Yahoo! ID required)
>
>    [email protected]
>
>
>
>
 

Reply via email to