> > Well this is the log file before the reboot. it would appear that these > > logs indicate that I should just use the remote metadata (and in turn > allow > > deletion of Spurious objects)? > > I don't follow. Do you mean the logfile that you quoted further down, > where it says that mount.s3ql refused to update the remote metadata? >
Yes, this entry 2014-06-16 12:16:29.444 [2342] Metadata-Upload-Thread: [mount] Remote metadata is newer than local (26 vs 25), refusing to overwrite! And my s3qladm show really old backups. But I guess I should still use the remote metadata (stored in the metadata object on s3) to return to a time pretty close to the unclean unmount? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "s3ql" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
