Rabid Mutant <[email protected]> writes: > I must admit I see the 'rsync -c' option as a much stronger guarantee > than a copy based on file dates & sizes, and this could be irrational. > But, if 100% cache can be achieved at nearly zero performance impact > *and* it supports rsync -c as well as an offline mode, this seems to > me like a big gain at minimal cost.
I think what you want in this case is use something like lsyncd. It uses inotify to determine changed files. So it can't miss anything even if you mess with file time stamps, and it does not require you to read the entire file: See also: https://bitbucket.org/nikratio/s3ql/wiki/FAQ#!is-there-a-way-to-make-the-cache-persistent-access-the-file-system-offline Best, -Nikolaus -- GPG encrypted emails preferred. Key id: 0xD113FCAC3C4E599F Fingerprint: ED31 791B 2C5C 1613 AF38 8B8A D113 FCAC 3C4E 599F »Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a Banana.« -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "s3ql" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
