> > Well, what about the reason that it doesn't work well with S3QL (which I > believe prompted you to start this thread)? > > Please can you explain? How is not working well? Im using it without any problems or errors for some time now data stored over 500GB(im still uploading..). Its unknown when 50k will reach will it broke things or not.. i was just in time bring it up in-case it will not work... Again without your software this was not possible. s3ql just make possible to use hubic. and without it users are forced to use hubicfuse what is slow/full of problems/not good. Nikolaus, please do you realize im very happy because of your work? :) without you this was never possible.
I promted on this thread to ask if there possible to do a swift:// folder thing like local:// uses just to have same directory/file structure, in-case i need access it direct and mount it via local on emergency. (and same time this will fix the problem of 50k file because local:// structure does folders under numbers and there is files under every number) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "s3ql" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
