At our end S3QL is working fine and we are already monitoring it for above mentioned parameters(CPU, MEM Utilization, I/O speed).
We are monitoring S3QL(or any service) so that we come to know that 'service health is OK' Here I am asking for your suggestions regarding S3QL monitoring. Thank You, -Prakash On Monday, 2 May 2016 21:11:10 UTC+5:30, Nikolaus Rath wrote: > > On May 01 2016, Prakash Autade <[email protected] <javascript:>> > wrote: > > Hello Nikolaus, > > > > We are using S3QL to mount AWS S3 > > > > Here, to keep the service running and functioning. we are monitoring > > S3QL(Mountpoints) against below parameters. > > > > 1. Service status check > > 2. CPU and Memory usage by S3QL processes > > 3. Read-Write speed on S3QL-Mountpoint > > > > It will be great, if you suggest some monitoring-parameters which helps > us > > to make s3ql-monitoring more robust. > > I'm not sure I understand the question. Is S3QL not behaving robustly > for you? If so, please report the problems. Or are you asking how to > measure the above? This sounds more like a general Linux monitoring > question, you can use whatever procedure you use for any other > process you monitor. > > Best, > -Nikolaus > > -- > GPG encrypted emails preferred. Key id: 0xD113FCAC3C4E599F > Fingerprint: ED31 791B 2C5C 1613 AF38 8B8A D113 FCAC 3C4E 599F > > »Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a Banana.« > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "s3ql" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
