On Jan 19 2017, Chris Davies <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> If I run fsck.s3ql against a filesystem, it's not possible to mount that 
> filesystem while the check is in progress. This is good.
>
> However, It seems that running s3ql_verify (without --data) does not lock 
> the S3QL filesystem against a mount. Should this be expected and safe 
> behaviour?

It is safe (since s3ql_verify does not modify the file system but
records the errors), but you may get spurious errors if you modify the
filesystem while s3ql_verify is running.

Not sure if it makes sense to enforce this or not...

Best,
-Nikolaus

-- 
GPG encrypted emails preferred. Key id: 0xD113FCAC3C4E599F
Fingerprint: ED31 791B 2C5C 1613 AF38 8B8A D113 FCAC 3C4E 599F

             »Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a Banana.«

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"s3ql" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to