OK..I just found this http://www.rath.org/s3ql-docs/tips.html which suggests exactly the solution I have used.
I wonder if there *might* be a better option for full file-system restore, one of: - copy the entire collection S3QL data from the remote to local first, then do a restore-from-local - add a special s3ql command to do a 'tree copy' -- it would know exactly which blocks it needed and download them en-masse while restoring files (and would need a lot of cache, possibly even a temporary cache drive) - a limited version of the above option to pre-fill the cache with all remote data blocks needed for a particular part of the tree > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "s3ql" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/s3ql/e7802128-da7e-4122-ae46-9a72e2480f48n%40googlegroups.com.
