On 2021-06-22 at 10:56 +0100, Nikolaus Rath wrote: > On Jun 22 2021, Ivan Shapovalov <[email protected]> wrote: > > I tried with 10 MiB block size and this made s3ql to re-upload 300 > > GiB > > when just 30 were changed this particular day. > > Does "30" refer to "30 MB of changes"? If so, then this isn't saying > anything.
30 GiB. Yes, of course, I was just saying it as a general observation, I understand how fixed-size block splitting works. > > If you change one byte every 10 MB, then S3QL would have to upload > every > block even though you only changed 30 MB of data. If, on the other > hand, > you write 30 MB in sequence, then S3QL should only upload 3 blocks. > If > anything else happens, there is a bug (and it would be great if you > could construct a small testcase that reproduces it). > > > Best, > -Nikolaus > > -- > GPG Fingerprint: ED31 791B 2C5C 1613 AF38 8B8A D113 FCAC 3C4E 599F > > »Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a Banana.« > -- Ivan Shapovalov / intelfx / -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "s3ql" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/s3ql/5e9d85946ecdd39c480914dcb5b14aa965dc2420.camel%40intelfx.name.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
