I don't know if it is useful but it doesn't hurt either and preserves some
history for the records, I mean just a dump of the commit log (git log). We
should also archive the entire git repo in svn and move on. I think history
should be hosted with the rest of the code.

-leo

On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 8:35 AM, Matthieu Morel <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 11/10/11 5:05 PM, Leo Neumeyer wrote:
>
>> I propose just putting the commit history in a separate file so it stays
>> in
>> the repository, what do you think?
>>
>> Let's just do this soon so we can complete the move.
>>
>>  In my opinion, a separate file with a list of commits would not be very
> useful.
>
> Considering that:
> 1. apparently we have to use svn for the master branch, and
> 2. we are working on a complete refactoring,
> I would suggest to simply forget the history for the migration of S4 0.4
> to svn, so that we can make progress with this task.
>
> We have the full history until the migration in github already anyway, if
> needed.
>
> Matthieu
>



-- 

Leo Neumeyer (@leoneu)

Reply via email to