Here's the script I use for ZK git submission to apache rb: https://github.com/phunt/apache-reviewboard-zk-git
you may need to tweak it a bit given your source is hosted in git but I've found it significantly reduces review creation overhead. Regards, Patrick On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 9:50 AM, Leo Neumeyer <[email protected]> wrote: > Sounds good to set up the system and give it a try. > > -leo > > On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Harsh J <[email protected]> wrote: >> +1 on ReviewBoard. It is pretty simple (looks and use) and works great. >> >> My only gripe is that its email-link to JIRA is pretty bad, and too noisy. >> Phabricator does a better job there. >> >> On 05-Jan-2012, at 11:14 PM, Matthieu Morel wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I was wondering if someone had some suggestions about the review board we >>> could use for reviewing patches in S4? >>> >>> The idea is not to add burden on the development process, but rather to >>> take advantage of new eyes with constructive suggestions, so that we can >>> improve and get a more comprehensive understanding of the codebase. >>> >>> It can also be easier to review patches that way. >>> >>> Patrick already commented about that in S4-35 "What are your plans re >>> review? Free form or some suggested collaboration tool? There's >>> http://reviews.apache.org however some projects have switch to gerrit or >>> phabricator (see HIVE-2486)". >>> >>> My take on that is that for the moment we should go for the Apache review >>> board, because it's already used in other Apache projects, has fairly good >>> reviews, and is probably much easier to set-up than other review boards. >>> And it has some support for git. >>> >>> What do you think? If no one disagrees, I (or someone else) could try to >>> set up Apache's review board for S4. >>> >>> Matthieu >> > > > > -- > > Leo Neumeyer (@leoneu)
