I like that approach of adding the JIRA number to each commit. One thing i noticed was that the commit summary does not get updated on the JIRA. Is there any thing we need to do any commit hook or its supposed happen automatically?
thanks, Kishore G On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Karthik Kambatla <[email protected]>wrote: > My bad. Just saw my +1 and discussion on that JIRA :) > > Can we augment our process to add JIRA number to each commit in the JIRA > branch? > > Thanks > Karthik > > On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Matthieu Morel <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > We have a slightly different approach, in which we integrate patches in > > separate branches. Branches are named by the jira number. See > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/S4-35 > > > > We then merge without fast forward, which allows a clear understanding of > > commits vs tickets. > > > > This works quite well, but we can update the process if needed of course. > > > > Matthieu > > > > > > On Jan 21, 2013, at 19:43 , Karthik Kambatla wrote: > > > > > Hello team, > > > > > > Firstly, great progress on performance, new features and bug fixes, > > mainly > > > thanks to Matthieu, Daniel, Aimee, and Kishore. > > > > > > I was just trying to catch up with the changes int he recent past, and > > felt > > > it would really help if we could annotate the commits with JIRA numbers > > so > > > that one could track the discussion/reasoning behind a particular > > approach. > > > Found these annotations really helpful on Apache Hadoop, and think we > > > should definitely consider. Thoughts? > > > > > > Thanks > > > Karthik > > > > >
