[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/S4-91?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13596004#comment-13596004
 ] 

Aimee Cheng commented on S4-91:
-------------------------------

Hi Daniel, thanks for your point out! I'll think more about how to check the 
data and update the test cases. And about the remote stream, you are right, the 
remote stream part is missed in the current patch and it will have problem if 
receive remote stream. Need change RemoteStream to use the informations of PEs 
to decide which nodes need be sent.

I plan to remove the round robin from remote emitter to RemoteStream. when do 
round robin, the remote events need be sent to exclusive nodes and all the 
other nodes by using the same way of current code. What do you think of that?

By the way, I am updating the code to fix the problem you mentioned, and will 
upload in this weekend I think.




                
> Runtime isolation
> -----------------
>
>                 Key: S4-91
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/S4-91
>             Project: Apache S4
>          Issue Type: Task
>    Affects Versions: 0.6
>            Reporter: Aimee Cheng
>            Assignee: Aimee Cheng
>             Fix For: 0.6
>
>         Attachments: 0001-runtime-isolation-implement.patch
>
>
> We would like to use runtime isolation. PEs from the same APP can split to 
> several sub-sets and run in different JVM processes, so that we might get 
> some benefit from it, such as isolating the PEs which cost a lot of 
> resources, easier to find out the PE with problem. 

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to