Hi,

I'm cancelling the vote due to 2 issues that were reported, mostly related to 
initialization and configuration. (S4-128 and S4-129)

We'll fix these and propose a new release candidate

Matthieu

On Mar 12, 2013, at 13:17 , Matthieu Morel wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> this is the first release candidate for Apache S4, version 0.6.0
> 
> 
> It fixes the following issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312322&version=12321702
> 
> 
> *** Please download, test and vote by Friday March 15th 2013, 14.00 GMT
> 
> 
> Note that we are voting upon the source (tag), binaries are provided for 
> convenience.
> 
> 
> Source and binary packages in zip format:
> 
> http://people.apache.org/~mmorel/s4-0.6.0-incubating-release-candidate-1/
> 
> 
> 
> The (git) tag to be voted upon: 0.6.0:
> 
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-s4.git;a=commit;h=632057fd3228de31e11996cd7eb35bdb8755a02b
> 
> 
> 
> S4 KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
> 
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/s4/dist/KEYS
> 
> 
> 
> Please cast your vote, thanks!
> 
> 
> [ ] +1  approve
> [ ] +0  no opinion
> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> 
> 
> 
> NOTES:
> 
> - All votes are welcome, only Podling Project Management Committe (PPMC) 
> votes are binding, current PPMC = mentors + initial committers
> 
> - All releases by podlings must be approved by the Incubator PMC. The 
> conventional process is for the podling to follow the usual Apache process 
> (including release vote, this one) and then call for a Incubator PMC VOTE on 
> the general incubator list.
> 
> - Votes on whether a package is ready to be released use majority approval -- 
> i.e., at least three PMC members must vote affirmatively for release, and 
> there must be more positive than negative votes. Releases may not be vetoed. 
> Before voting +1 PMC members are required to download the signed source code 
> package, compile it as provided, and test the resulting executable on their 
> own platform, along with also verifying that the package meets the 
> requirements of the ASF policy on releases.

Reply via email to