(From Swazi Media Commentary 24 September 2010 www.swazimedia.blogspot.com Also
on Face book at 
http://www.facebook.com/Swazi.Media.Commentary?v=wall#!/group.php?gid=142383985790674&ref=ts).






  Just how bad is the state of Swaziland’s economy?

     It’s
 a ‘catastrophe’ if you believe Roman Grynberg, senior research fellow 
at the non-governmental Botswana Institute for Development Policy 
Analysis, who said
 this week that changes made in the past to the way Southern Africa 
Customs Union (SACU) 
revenues were distributed, added to further changes being discussed for 
the future, would have ‘absolutely catastrophic’ consequences for 
countries such as Swaziland and would be ‘serious for political 
stability in the whole Southern African region’.

     Grynberg
 was predicting the future, but the present is pretty grim as well.

     There
 are rumours flying around Swaziland at present that the government of King 
Mswati III,
 sub-Saharan Africa’s last absolute monarch, is 
overspending by E30 million a month (4.2 million US dollars) and is 
using its foreign currency reserves to pay bills.

     Finance
 Minister Majozi
 Sithole has already said that government 
revenues are so low that ‘non-SACU’ revenues are not enough to 
pay the government wage bill. There are well-founded fears that the 
government will not be able to pay civil service salaries from next 
month (October 2010).

     The
 government needs income and it needs it quickly. It is trying all the 
usual tricks of economists to stay afloat, such as seeking loans, 
selling assets, issuing bonds.

     So
 far they have little success. In August 2010 the World Bank and the 
International Monetary Fund refused
 to support Swaziland in its effort to secure a 500 million US 
dollar loan from the African Development Bank on the grounds that the 
government had consistently ignored warnings that its wages and salaries
 bill was too high for a kingdom of its size.

     There
 is little interest in buying bonds in Swaziland (countries all over the
 world, most with much more stable economies than Swaziland, are selling
 bonds), which leaves the sale of assets as the last resort. But, 
Swaziland has few state -held assets, but what it does have is an 
unknown amount of wealth ‘held in trust’ for the Swazi people by King 
Mswati, but there is little likelihood that he will give up his control 
of this money to help out.

     All
 that is realistically left for Swaziland is aid from the international 
community to ensure that people don’t starve and that the health and 
education services in the kingdom don’t grind to a halt.

     But
 the Swazi regime didn’t help its cause earlier this month when police 
and security forces harassed and intimidated
 foreign nationals
 during the Global
 Week of Action  before
 throwing them out of the kingdom.



     This
 action will not make people in developed countries feel well disposed 
to Swaziland.

     There
 is also suspicion that ‘development aid’ destined for Swaziland doesn’t
 go where it is needed, but instead is siphoned off by
 King Mswati to pay for his palaces, Mercedes cars and his general 
lavish lifestyle.

     So
 to sum up: there is overspending by E30 million a month, little chance 
of selling bonds or assets or securing loans, and a potentially 
unsympathetic international community.



     Sounds
 to me like Grynberg’s ‘catastrophe’ has already struck.
Link http://swazimedia.blogspot.com/2010/09/swaziland-economy-catastrophe.html 





      

-- 
NEW!!!! SSN FORUM IS ON FACEBOOK!!!!
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Swaziland 
Solidarity Network Forum Google Group. 
Visit the group home page at 
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/sa-swaziland-solidarity-eom-forum for more 
options, pages and files.
To post to the group, send email to 
[email protected] or reply to this message.
To unsubscribe, send email to 
[email protected]

Reply via email to