Some thoughts about SA wrapper
There is some stuff about wrapper that worries me.
Wrapper works above SA and it has to run SA, in other words to run processes.
Unfortunately it's not clear how to organize the same wrapper behavior in
different OS. We, unfortunately couldn't (currently) organize processes-error
handling in wrapper. In such situation I see two variants:
1. Investigate how we can operate with process in "native" C code (popen() &
_popen())
2. Use QT :-)
I suggest to use QT because:
1. This will save our time (easy to develop & support)
2. It provides more comfortable way of process managing (it's easy
to interrupt
process, and so on)
3. It provides unified interfaces (API) for EVERY supported OS
4. It gives extra functionality which depends on OS and may be
useful in future:
- Work with File System
- Networking
- Lots of stuff ^_^
PS We are not going to use QT in SA directly because one of SA
architecture statement is to be independent from OS on code level
(UknowWhatI'mTalkingAbout).
--
Best Regards,
Fedor Korshunov
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"SA_team" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.ru/group/sa_team?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---