Tom,
> > I'm a little puzzled about the mentioned extensions. I believe these should be
>bound
> > to another namespace to avoid violation of the W3C-specs (...)
>
> Definitely, but I think that was just an example. Wouldn't 'sab' be a
> nice prefix?
Then my puzzlement is at ease. :) And yes, that seems like a good one.
> I'm not sure you're right. The braces have the special meaning in any
> attribute value template. Attributes of literal result elements are
> interpreted this way, but the same holds for a dozen of XSLT element
> attributes, e.g. <xsl:element name="{...}"/>. In the spec, such
> attributes are shown in braces.
You're absolutely right! I totally missed that use of them (guess I'm still
traumatized by
my original misconception of braces and variables). I wrongly assumed that every
attribute
in xslt-elements undergoes some form of evaluation/interpolation; overlooking many
things.
But now I've learned that section of the spec as well. And a lesson. ;)
regards
Niklas
