Kaiserovi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Do you mean the extension functions/elements as in the specification? We
Yes.
> do plan to support these, it's a must; the plan is to let the user set
> up a callback to receive calls to extension functions in a particular
> namespace. Now these functions will probably need full DOM-like access
These sounds great.
> to the XML trees; for this, they will have a new C API (seems better
> than direct access to the "real" object representation). I'm not sure
> about how to deal with the different types yet.
I agree. Being a C-programmer (and not really being very well adversed
in C++), a pure C-interface would be great.
If there is anything I can help with let me know. As I said above
though, I'm a C-programmer so I might not be of much help. :-(
--
[ Below is a random fortune, which is unrelated to the above message. ]
I love dogs, but I hate Chihuahuas. A Chihuahua isn't a dog. It's a rat
with a thyroid problem.
