The reason I use Sablotron at all, is that I had problems getting the XSL
styling in IE to work at all. And if it worked in local test, it didn't out
on the server. I had to restart IE to get a reload of a changed XSL etc etc.
So for me, running Sablotron in bat files, is faster than running IE on a
server. I want to spend my time learning XSL/T, not fiddling with IE to
make the tool work.
What you asked, was of course about raw program performance. I don't think
that's relevant yet, XSL is so immature that "works or not" is the real
question. Being done in C++, it will always be possible to speed it up later.
Jan Egil Kristiansen
Landsbanki F�roya http://landsbank.fo/
Faroe Islands
Anyone compared perfomance and features of Sablotron
>vs. MS XSL parser? I heard that MS XSL parser is faster.
>Is it true?
