A while back I had a go at this.  I got Sablotron-0.36 to build sabcmd OK 
using automake, autoconf and libtool.  I did not however manage to get the 
produced libraries to link with perl.

This is under FreeBSD, and I am so far unaware of any one who has managed to 
get the perl module to link correctly by any means under FreeBSD, so I am not 
sure if this was due to anything I did wrong, or to these build tools.

libtool's documentation does contain warnings that there are problems with 
using it to build C++ libraries.

I'm happy to send my code to anyone who wants to look at what i did.

Andrew McNaughton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


On Wed, 19 Jul 2000 13:05:04 +0200 Kaiserovi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  wrote:
> Sven,
> 
> we definitely consider using automake and libtool but as we just started
> with this automatic kind of stuff, we don't have a clear idea of what
> the pros and cons would be. (Note that the recent problems with -soname
> on Solaris appear to have been solved.) We'll appreciate any opinions. 
> 
> Tom
> 
> 
> Sven Neumann wrote:
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I have noticed that Sablotron now uses autoconf which is
> > definitely the right thing to do. But why doesn't it use
> > the other tools that integrate nicely with autoconf? I
> > suggest using automake and libtool (since we want to
> > build a library). Is there any reason why automake is not
> > yet used? If not, I could try to integrate it and provide
> > a patch.
> > 
> > Salut, Sven

-- 
--
Andrew McNaughton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cellphone: +64 21 323 3076


[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.scoop.co.nz/

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.tki.org.nz/



Reply via email to