On Monday, April 3, 2017 at 10:36:14 PM UTC-7, Andrey Novoseltsev wrote: > > On Monday, 3 April 2017 19:34:14 UTC-6, Paul Masson wrote: >> >> The number of CPUs can't be the direct cause, since the evaluations just >> queue up and come back when a CPU is available, right? I can accept that, >> but when the evaluations never return it's a problem. >> >> > If it does become a major problem then something has to be done on server > side to automatically limit the rate of computations for particular > users/pages instead of relying on page authors not doing something. >
I would appreciate some clarity on this statement. If you have future restrictions in mind, I would like to know what that might entail. And before you impose restrictions of any sort, you need to have explicit guidelines publicly available detailing what is and what is not going to be allowed. If a feature is available, I would expect the service to be capable of supporting it. If autoevaluation is not going to be supported, it should be disabled completely. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-cell" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-cell/3f8cf47a-e37b-46ac-b1b0-ed572ef92506%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
