Interesting, apparently you must have already done something to fix this just like the PTX people will be. Good news.
On Sunday, June 13, 2021 at 3:03:31 PM UTC-4 [email protected] wrote: > SageMathCell does use MJ3 already, maybe not the best idea to get out of > sync with SageMath itself, but I hope that with the next release all issues > will be ironed out and so far it has not caused many issues... > > On Saturday, 12 June 2021 at 07:54:35 UTC-6 kcrisman wrote: > >> Sorry for the noise - possibly irrelevant in the near future with >> https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31517 >> >> On Saturday, June 12, 2021 at 9:49:50 AM UTC-4 kcrisman wrote: >> >>> Hi Andrey et al., >>> >>> Apparently MJ 3 behaves differently with respect to <script> elements, >>> and it's just something to be aware of should we transition that direction. >>> See https://groups.google.com/g/pretext-support/c/3IGyHq6zJo8 for how >>> that affected some embedded Sage cells in one instance, and for links to >>> how it was configured to fix. >>> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-cell" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-cell/a06b7447-c89c-4071-b608-fc4d307f8ffdn%40googlegroups.com.
