Thanks again for the chat, Harald and William. That approach seems to be
working - I'm seeing my CSS doing its job, and I'm not seeing various artifacts
elsewhere from when I was not being so careful. I think that will work fine on
my end.
I have the html() decorator just once in a single template (subroutine) so I
don't think I have a need for the "class=" keyword. And I'm planning to escape
the HTML into the JSON output version, so I'll need to insert it there myself as
well.
But maybe this exercise suggests it will be useful for others?
Thanks,
Rob
On 10/01/2016 10:52 AM, Harald Schilly wrote:
On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 7:48 PM, Rob Beezer <[email protected]> wrote:
So maybe instead, *I* should just wrap the entire HTML cell in a div of my
own ...
yes, this sounds like a good plan. Maybe even more general, we could
add a parameter html(class="my-own-classname") right there, to spare
you having to wrap this into a div.
but first, try to do this as a test.
-- h
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-cloud" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-cloud/MTAwMDA0My5iZWV6ZXI.1475352592%40quikprotect.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
