> > The main issue issue is that #8414 changes the `lattice` method of > > WeylGroups to `space` and Nicolas gave a reason why this might be > > inaccurate sometimes. Perhaps that needs to be discussed here? My > > view is that `space` might be sometimes wrong but not egregiously, > > whereas `lattice` is definitely bad terminology. The only > > alternative I can think of would be `module,` and if Nicolas > > strongly prefers that, I will revise #8414 and the tutorial. But I > > sort of like `space`. > > Let's see how the discussion on Sage devel goes. So far not much > feedback ...
This might be mainly your call, since you reviewed #8414 with the comment about space being sometimes incorrect. If you dislike "space" and prefer changing lattice -> module (or can think of a better alternative) I will revise the patch that way. But it seems to me that "space" is better than "lattice" here and usually correct. But if #8414 is not to be merged before the documentation patches I will have to revise #8442. Dan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-combinat-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-de...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel?hl=en.
