On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 03:29:41AM -0700, tom d wrote:
> Yeah, so the failure's definitely happening in the check for version
> guards. I added a couple print statements in the update script to try
> to figure out what's happening; does this look like the right kind of
> thing to you?
>
> current sage version: [4, 6, 2]
> hg_all_guards: ['guards in series file:', ' 1 +4_1_2', ' 2 -4_3_1',
> ' 3 +4_3_1', ' 1 -4_3_2', ' 2 +4_3_2', ' 2 +4_3_3', ' 1 +4_3_3:',
> ' 2 +4_3_4', ' 1 -4_4', ' 1 +4_4', ' 2 +4_4_1', ' 1 +4_4_2', ' 1
> +4_4_3', ' 1 +4_4_4', ' 2 -4_5', ' 4 +4_5', ' 3 -4_5_2', ' 1
> +4_5_2', ' 1 +4_5_3', ' 1 -4_6', ' 1 +4_6', ' 9 -4_6_1', ' 1
> +4_6_1', ' 4 -4_6_2', ' 2 +4_6_2', ' 1 -4_7', '45 +4_7', ' 7
> +4_7_1', ' 1 +5_0', '150 NONE', ' 3 +coerce', '18 +disabled', ' 3
> +experimental', ' 1 +free_to_assign', ' 1 +fun', ' 1
> +keep_for_possible_future_use', ' 1 +long_compilation', ' 1
> +needs_rebase', ' 1 +not_finished', ' 1 +not_wanted', ' 1
> +power_zero', ' 2 +tentative_implementation', ' 1 +words_ng_fixme']
> version guards: []
> all guards: []
>
> The script takes the output of the hg_all_guards() function (given
> above) and then uses a method to figure out if it's a new version
> guard or not; this check is apparently always returning false. So the
> question is whether the hg_all_guards output above looks sensible, or
> whether it's funky somehow (like, say, those leading numerals).
Ah! The leading numerals seem funky indeed, and could well point to
the issue. I don't get them when I do
> sage -hg qselect -s
+4_1_2
-4_3_1
...
Can you try disabling everything in your hgrc except for the
hgext.mq=, and see if sage -hg qselect -s returns to a normal
behaviour?
Cheers,
Nicolas
--
Nicolas M. ThiƩry "Isil" <[email protected]>
http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-combinat-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel?hl=en.