On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 06:46:33PM -0700, Anne Schilling wrote:
> Ok, here it is and the new method is indeed much better, so I will
> incorporate it
> into the patch:
Nice :-) Cool job!
> I can explain, but perhaps not on a public mailing list ... (plus
> the new method is better).
All I am saying is that, in both cases, the algorithm depends on non
trivial enough properties that it deserves some explanation or
reference for them (since we can't refer to some implementation
elsewhere).
Cheers,
Nicolas
--
Nicolas M. Thiéry "Isil" <nthi...@users.sf.net>
http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-combinat-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel?hl=en.
