> Did you make a quick benchmark on Partitions().random_element(), with > and without caching? Given that number_of_partitions (which was > already fast) was even further optimized recently, maybe caching is > not relevant anymore? > > Hi Nicolas,
I have just noticed that Trac #13199 <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13199>implements a new version of number_of_partitions using flint. Was this the recent "optimisation" that you were referring to? I was using Bober's implementation. Andrew -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-combinat-devel" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sage-combinat-devel/-/XrXukBJqR-EJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel?hl=en.
