On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 11:29:43PM -0800, Anne Schilling wrote:
> I added lots more!

Thanks!

Too bad, there won't be 42 Sage-Combinat contributors anymore :-)

> Please check.

Did you push? ;-)

> I am more worried about the number of tickets and tickets in progress.
> I am sure that must be more than 300 + 200 by now!!

I tried to come up with two reasonable ticket searches on trac for
closed and in progress ``Sage-Combinat'' tickets. My rule of thumb at
this point is tickets that are either in the combinatorics component,
or with sage-combinat in CC. That gives 1000 closed tickets, and 111
in progress. This certainly includes some tickets that we are
interested in following, but where we are not really
contributing. Although on the other hand we also contribute to some
tickets that are not counted above. I did not include tickets marked
as "new".

Does this sound fair enough?

I added links to those searches from the wiki (see in the Code section
of http://wiki.sagemath.org/combinat). Anyone feel free to update if
you come up with a better rule of thumb.

> > http://igm.univ-mlv.fr/~teresa/2013octPostersAERES/CombinatoireAlgebrique/SageCombinat2013_FR.pdf
> > http://igm.univ-mlv.fr/~teresa/2013octPostersAERES/CombinatoireAlgebrique/SageCombinat2013_EN.pdf
> 
> They look a lot less cluttered than the original. Maybe there is too much
> information on the current poster.

Yes, possibly so. Or maybe we just need to versions depending on the
public. Anyway, the light versions above have been produced with Adobe
Illustrator, so nothing that we can instantly recycle.

> What about a new photo
> 
> https://plus.google.com/104950635599549990272/posts/Sgf3xsg8L6h?gpinv=AMIXal_mef6a0pNueTuO6Qd_GZqEIF67ninIldXnBwJHuIPBP9Qkxm9gmmrraw-k9HUDlCNIEO7iuH6cADqvTekSFxeBRlozoW-kbZ5i-Yq-DNudRxjLOxQ&cfem=1
> 
> or
> 
> https://plus.google.com/104950635599549990272/posts/Sgf3xsg8L6h?gpinv=AMIXal_mef6a0pNueTuO6Qd_GZqEIF67ninIldXnBwJHuIPBP9Qkxm9gmmrraw-k9HUDlCNIEO7iuH6cADqvTekSFxeBRlozoW-kbZ5i-Yq-DNudRxjLOxQ&cfem=1

Nice picture indeed! The links are identical though: which one is the
second one?

The picture from Sage Days 40 is not great, but it shows a big
group. If we replace it, we probably want one with a large group too,
or several with smaller groups, in order to highlight the community.

Cheers,
                                Nicolas
--
Nicolas M. ThiĆ©ry "Isil" <[email protected]>
http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-combinat-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to