I find it quite difficult now to follow this thread, I see the answer to
some emails that are not even in the thread...
Anyway, I just want to answer to this specific sentence of Nathan: "This is
only technical issues, nothing more. But I hate that it takes one year to
see it fixed."
Well, Nathan, you just have to live with it! See, we're all working on a
global project depending on lots of people, we all have to wait. The fact
that you hate / love something has no impact on my time line whatsoever.
And you should understand that you won't make things faster by a) insulting
people (as you did last year) and b) giving orders (as you just did in this
very thread).
2014-05-27 20:29 GMT+02:00 Nathann Cohen <nathann.co...@gmail.com>:
> > You asked how you failed me.
>
> Are you *REALLY* answering to that question ? O_o
>
> > Well, I know for a fact that your behaviour on the list has put off
> people from contributing to sage.
>
> Gosh. You are.
>
> > Certainly me, and others who could have contributed indirectly to my
> research projects. So that's how you have failed me, since you ask. But
> that's something I have tolerated for a couple years now.
>
> AHAHahahahahahahaahahahh
>
> > The reason for my email is different: if your attitude persists, it is
> likely to derail what I am trying to do now along the same lines, when it
> is actually starting.
>
> (eating popcorn)
>
> > One option is to truly explain to you what it is that I am trying to do.
> At this point, you are approximately 3 PhD thesis, 7-8 or so research
> papers and a good 15 talks (but they are recorded) behind in terms of
> reading, if you want the background material.
>
> Gosh. You will never find a hat to fit this head.
>
> > Yet you send me to yet another thread that I have already read (and
> participated in).
>
> So you noticed.
>
> > Also, your ticket's description is a hodgepodge of one precise
> ("Graph.to_partition is very badly named") and two large grievances ("only
> there for findstat", "find_stat, a project distinct from Sage"). I have not
> made up my mind on the precise, but I know I disagree with the two large
> grievances, and am more informed than you there.
>
> Oh. Well, if this is a problem for you please remove those lines from the
> ticket, I do not mind. Surely that has no impact on the actual changes
> brought to Sage ?
>
> > I like Vincent's approach better than either of ours. Why don't we both
> change tone and try to contribute constructively in "his" thread?
>
> Which thread ? Must haved missed it O_o
>
> > PS: Francoise == Francoise Genova, the astronomer who was invited in
> Edinburgh.
>
> Quite frankly, I have no memory for names and faces.
>
> Nathann
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "sage-combinat-devel" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-combinat-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
