> > E.g., it should know domain and codomain, and it should know > what category it belongs to. I think it makes sense to let a morphism > know whether it is injective or surjective. However, additional > information that is certainly interesting to researchers (e.g.: "Was first > defined by John Doe in his seminal paper in Journal of Applied > Irrelevance") clearly should not be stored as an attribute of a morphism. >
I do not see any reason why such information should not be stored somewhere within sage, possibly in form of a database. Could you please explain? Martin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-combinat-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
