Please, lets make this all work by just defining
functions with either 'def' or 'lambda',
personally I think that feels *by far* the most natural.
-Alex
On 12/6/06, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 06 Dec 2006 01:15:58 -0800, Joel B. Mohler
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > ** I'm not clear from the maxima.py source code whether the result of
> > integration/differentiation is an opaque string from maxima or if we
> > re-parse
> > it (I doubt we re-parse because that seems unnecessarily difficult). If
> > we
> > don't reparse, I think that the maxima interface might need to know
> about
> > dummy variables to some minor extent.
>
> Currently the if f is a maxima object the f.integrate('x'), says, gives
> another maxima object. You can get the string rep of that object, or
> call functions with it as input.
>
> If we are going to reparse maxima results back to SAGE (and it's not 100%
> clear to me yet if we will, but it's likely), we'll "just" have to define
> all the objects that can appear in a maxima expression, do a little
> preparsing
> (e.g., replace %pi by pi), then call sage_eval on the string.
>
> William
>
>
>
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
