> Hmmm I'm a bit confused. Here's what I imagine in my ideal world: > > (1) We have a .pxi file for "easy usage of the NTL C++ library from > other pyrex classes", as you say above. > (2) The Polynomial_integer_dense class is implemented in pyrex. Its > member functions call NTL functions directly and work with NTL > objects directly. In particular, the ntl.pyx file would no longer > exist (except as repository history :-)), and neither would ntl_wrap.cc.
True, to provide NTL functionality for core SAGE objects those should vanish. Though, some core SAGE objects might be implemented in Python and call a Pyrex class handling NTL for them. Also libs/ntl could still exist as an NTL shell. This is secondary but might come in handy somehow, I don't know. Martin -- name: Martin Albrecht _pgp: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x8EF0DC99 _www: http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~malb _jab: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
