David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> But shouldn't the rank of m (as a (ZZ/4ZZ)-module) be 1?
> I'm surprised someone implemented (if even bug-ily, if bug-ily
> is a word) a method for determining the rank of a (ZZ/mZZ)-module,
> for M is not a prime.

Yes, that's the point.  Either both should work, or both should be
errors, but one error and one silent failure is not acceptable :)

Nick

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to