While doing "singular.interact()" I see that lots and lots of variables (named: sage*) are being defined in the singular interface. Basically for every intermediate result and then some. I have not looked in detail but are these variables recycled when the corresponding python object goes out of scope? Otherwise this is a memory leak (these variables usual contain polynomials).
Michel On May 20, 7:13 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 5/20/07, Michel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Thanks a lot for the feedback! > > > But I could not download your patch. I get a file with just one > > newline. > > Sorry -- I don't know why. > I'm releasing sage-2.5.2 today, and it will have the patch > in it among other things. You can browse it by using > hg_sage.browse() from within sage. > > > Looking at it again I see that it easy to implement in the > > same style the other coefficient rings singular supports > > (transcendental extensions over QQ and Z/pZ). > > Please do! > > > Michel --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
