I'm happy with the Attribution-ShareAlike Creative Commons license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/ I think there is also a GPL Documentation license which is similar.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ On 7/7/07, Martin Albrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi there, > > do we have a license on the SAGE Wiki content? I am not so firm when it comes > to documentation licenses, but basically I would like it to be as open as > possible, e.g. it should be possible to put Wiki content in a book (with > proper credits). How about the documentation in general? > > Thoughts? > Martin > > -- > name: Martin Albrecht > _pgp: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x8EF0DC99 > _www: http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~malb > _jab: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
