don't know if this is important: - i might have missed it, but the article doesn't seem to indicate that the authors of the article are also authors of sage (and would possibly benefit financially from ams support of sage)
On Aug 4, 4:09 pm, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > word count of about 800 > > On 8/4/07, Chris Chiasson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > what were the criteria? > > > On Aug 4, 3:48 pm, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi: > > > > William Stein and I have written a > > > drafthttp://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wdj/research/oscas-ams-notices4.pdf > > > which seems suitable (based on suggestions and criteria given to us by > > > the editor > > > Andy Magid). Thoughts anyone? > > > > - David Joyner --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
