I agree with most of what Paul said, except that the thread on karakas
has a page rank of 2, so I am not sure what the ROI would be on that
one.

For comparison, SAGE's homepage has a page rank of 6. My homepage,
which can easily be located, has a page rank of 5. Slashdot's homepage
has a page rank of 9, etc...

The [mathematica free] search keyword is clever. I think I've
personally searched for that many times.

Also, it helps to have a domain name where the individual words are
separated. Search engines will boost site rankings for search terms
that appear in the domain name:
sage-math.org
or sage.math.org
or sage.math.net
or sage.net

If you make an email signature (that you use on reputable mailing
lists) which contains the aforementioned type of domain name in a URL,
you can obtain a double bonus. The reason for this is that mailing
list (and newsgroup) messages are (usually) automatically converted to
HTML archives where URLs are hyperlinked. When this happens, you gain
a link from a reputable source that has your key words in the anchor
text. Anchor text has a lot of weight; it's what people used to Google
bomb the keywords [miserable failure].

On Aug 9, 5:54 am, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am not a SAGE developer, and I'll probably say things that most of
> you know already, but I thought about this so I might as well email
> the list.
> Here is how to go about and possibly improve rankings on Google (*):
>
> Step 1: Everyone on this list could make sure to add a link to
> sagemath.org on their homepage, preferably with "free", "open-source",
> "math" and "software" spelled out close to the link
>
> Step 2: The sagemath.org website definitely needs meta data to be
> added. The same keywords and more, maybe a dozen total. Google uses
> those. One could say this wouldn't help for a search on the single
> term "sage", but I am not sure: the very last step that Google
> performs in every search is to make sure that it has diversity in the
> output (make sure it talks about herbs, fly-fishing rods and
> software). So I would suspect the sagemath.org website suffers on a
> search for the single word "sage" mostly because there are already
> quite a lot of programs out there called "sage", and Google will only
> display so many in the top ten. Helping Google  (through the meta)
> distinguish how one is different from the other might help.
>
> Step 3: Definitely buy Google ads. Who would find SAGE through Google
> that has never heard about it? I could imagine that someone searching
> for "free mathematica" would be very interested to learn about SAGE.
> Also you would get data out of it, since you can see which keywords
> seem to work with people. Finally, with Google Ads you only spend as
> much as you are willing to spend (I can't remember if there is a lower
> limit/month or what it is). That data must be worth some cash.
>
> Step 4: Go around and post on forums. For instance, if you search for
> "mathematica free" (without the quotes), this shows up high up, at
> least for me:http://www.karakas-online.de/forum/viewtopic.php?t=189. A 
> website,
> highly ranked by Google, where people seem to be interested in
> something exactly like SAGE. Doesn't matter how old the conversation
> really is (in that case it was initiated 4 years ago, but the latest
> post is 6 months old), it would be good for all (the forum users,
> Google, SAGE users and developers) if someone took the time to post a
> paragraph about SAGE and a link to sagemath.org on many similar posts.
> It would help drain some PageRank to sagemath.org.
>
> Suggestion: Writing this up, I have a question. What is the correct
> case? sage, Sage or SAGE? Is it standardized? For example, in the
> Firefox search bar that was just posted yesterday, it seems to be
> written Sage. On the website, it's always (?) written SAGE, except in
> the logo where it looks like "sage". Google picks up on those
> differences, sometimes, and it could be helpful.
>
> Paul
> (*) This is backed up: for a while I was the first hit when searching
> for "chocolate mousse" (without quotes) ! Unfortunately I have come
> down to 10th since moving to Oxford. :)
>
> On Aug 8, 9:14 am, Chris Chiasson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > This is kinda off the wall:
>
> > Mathematica, Maple, and Matlab don't have a lot of competition for
> > their keywords on Google, Yahoo, or MSN.
>
> > By offering a **very low bid** on each of the names, you could
> > probably put a message about the SAGE open source project on each of
> > their names. In addition, you could do the same for SAGE's name.
>
> > Together with the nice solid application based tutorials suggestion
> > mentioned in this thread, you might easily siphon off their new users
> > (and some old hands too).
>
> > On Aug 7, 5:22 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Hi Sage-Devel,
>
> > > The SAGE downloads during the last week are as follows:
>
> > > Linux Binary
> > > 42
> > > OS X Binary
> > > 42
> > > Source
> > > 91
> > > VMware (= Windows)
> > > 57
>
> > > Total .................................. 232
>
> > > The number of new downloads of SAGE per week have been roughly
> > > constant during the last 2-3 months.   The growth of SAGE is definitely
> > > not what I hoped for during my talk at SAGE Days 4.    Does anybody
> > > have any good ideas about how to increase the number of people
> > > downloading SAGE?   My hope is that this question will spark a relaxed
> > > but enthusiastic and positive open-ended brainstorming thread in which
> > > a lot of crazy ideas appear.
>
> > > I'm laying a lot of groundwork (e.g., writing books, articles, etc.)
> > > and I think other people are (esp David Joyner), but there is probably
> > > much more that could be done.
>
> > > Please share your thoughts!
>
> > >     -- William


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to