On 9/19/07, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > def srange(a,b=None,step=1, include_endpoint=False):
> >
> > What does your irange do differently?  And why the i?
> > Does it mean "include" endpoints?  That makes sense
> > actually.
> >
>
> I'm somehow not amused with your answer. Nevertheless I answered
> to sage-devel.

I didn't mean any of my questions to be rhetorical or answers.  They
were all sincere questions.  I'm sorry if email didn't convey what I
wanted to say clearly.

I personally think the idea of irange is very sensible.    The srange function
I wrote isn't very good, since it is too slow (it's not in Cython, etc.).
It would be nice if irange were implemented from the start to
be highly optimized, and if there were further discussion about
it before it goes into Sage, given how many interesting opinions and
ideas people had about ranges during the recent discussion.

William

William

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to