William Stein wrote: > Robert: >> I think using [] to specify lists is clean and pythonic. We are >> basically extending the grammar >> list_display ::= >> "[" [listmaker] "]" > > Yep. It make sense. It's possibly not even completely unreasonable > that this notation could eventually (and I mean in a long long time) > make its way into Python. >
http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0204/ Range literals didn't make it. Mainly because of the 'wrong and confusing' notation with the slice operator ':'. Maybe a PEP introducing the '..' will eventually be acceptable? Jaap --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
