> With this fix, the function I was writing will be about 10 times faster > than the Mathematica equivalent on my test case instead of just being > the same speed as Mathematica :). Thanks!
Cool! > Mathematica is still ~20x faster (.04 seconds for the code above), but > now things are much more usable in SAGE. Mathematica also seems to > generate things in a "nice" order, but those issues can be projects for > another day. Yeah, there's a bit of Python overhead there. For subsets, they are ordered by size and then lexicographically. I think almost all the CombintorialClasses should have a logical ordering. Are there any specific instances that you're thinking of? --Mike --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
