On Nov 21, 6:27 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 19, 2007 11:49 PM, mabshoff
>
>
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Nov 20, 6:12 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi,
>
> > > I just did a test and using the new version of g95 here:
>
> > > http://ftp.g95.org/g95-x86-osx.tgz
>
> > > works fine for building Sage on Leopard OS X 10.5 intel.
> > > So, we can just update that and stop worrying about require
> > > gfortran on that platform. Very nice, and this means we'll be
> > > able to easily close trac #1005!!
>
> > > NOTE - I also tested cvxopt building, and it works fine too.
>
> > > -- Wiliam
>
> > Hello,
>
> > I have update the fortran.spkg with that g95 and I am testbuilding on
> > bsd. Do we also need to update the g95 for 10.5 on PPC or is this an
> > x86 issue only?
>
> It probably couldn't hurt to do so, but I really have no idea since I don't
> have access to any 10.5 PPC machines. If the updated g95 works on
> ppc 10.4 also then it would be worth updating on general principle.
>
> -- William
I was somewhat surprised that the 10.5 compatible g95 was roughly
twice as large as the 10.4 version, but that might be due to 64 bit
runtime libraries. This is just a hunch at the moment, but we will
find out in the next couple weeks.
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
