On Nov 23, 2007, at 21:11 , William Stein wrote:

>
> On Nov 23, 2007 8:18 PM, Justin C. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> This is all really weird since I fully tested building  
>>> Sage-2.8.13 on
>>> OSX 10.4 intel and OSX 10.5 intel (both core duo and Xeon),
>>> and didn't have any problems at all.   So the problem could
>>> be with...
> ...
>> I reported this during one of the "alpha/rc" cycles (2.8.10.alpha?, I
>> think), and tried the "move /usr/local out of the way" trick.  That
>
> I see!   The problem was definitely in 2.8.13.rc0 I think, because  
> I found
> it then, and then somebody subsequently fixed it as a result, i.e.,  
> the
> problem is fixed in 2.8.13 (but not before).

Do you mean 2.18.14?  This showed up for me in the released 2.8.13.

>>> Something I've wondered about for a while -- is there a bulletproof
>>> way to ignore /usr/local/ during build of Sage?
>>
>> I think 'gcc' has flags that let you force the lookup paths for
>> "system-supplied" includes and libs.  I'll see if I can track that  
>> down.
>
> That would be very very interesting indeed.

This will take a bit of time to run to ground...there are a handful  
of flags, and they have overlapping functionality.  I'll send a  
synopsis when I've digested what Xcode has to say.

Justin

--
Justin C. Walker, Curmudgeon-At-Large
Institute for the Absorption of Federal Funds
--------
If you're not confused,
You're not paying attention
--------




--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to