On Dec 6, 2007 7:49 AM, Joel B. Mohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think this would be great. Do recursive dependencies get caught now? They > didn't 6 months ago. For example, if I have a .pxd included (cimported, > whatever) in another .pxd which is included in a .pyx: i.e. > a.pxd -> b.pxd -> c.pxd -> c.pyx > then modifications of a.pxd should trigger c.pyx to compile. We don't do a > lot > of this so it doesn't matter often, but when it does happen it can cause a > great > deal of developer confusion.
I don't think it addresses this issue -- Bobby might know. > > I have a sage tree with a patch for this somewhere in the back-waters of my > harddrive, but it was costly to compute timewise (roughly doubled the no-op > build) and I was too lazy to submit it. But if the cacheing could make this > fast, I think we should fix this. Please submit it. William All --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
