Good work!

Can I change the second sentence of this text please?

> John Cremona's programs for enumerating and computating with elliptic
> curves defined over the rational numbers. This is the culmination of
> over 30 years of hard work and careful polish.

It's more like 25...   and since I am still fixing bugs I find the
"careful polish" a little embarrassing (but thank you, William!)

John

On 31/12/2007, mabshoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> since I am currently testing out the latest eclib (see #1058) I am
> rewriting the SPKG.txt to reflect some of the issue raised in the
> "Most Sage spkg's are out of date!" thread. The SPKG.txt is now
> written in wiki text and has a couple standard sections:
>
> [begin example]
> = eclib [i.e. name of spkg] =
>
> == Description ==
>
> John Cremona's programs for enumerating and computating with elliptic
> curves defined over the rational numbers. This is the culmination of
> over 30 years of hard work and careful polish.
>
> == Maintainers ==
>
>  * William Stein
>  * John Cremona
>  * Ralph Philip Weinmann
>  * Michael Abshoff
>
> == Upstream Contact ==
>
>  * Author: John Cremona
>  * Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  * Website: http://www.warwick.ac.uk/~masgaj/mwrank/index.html
>
> == Distribution ==
>
> === Padus ===
>  * Contact: Ismail Dönmez
>  * EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  * Website: N/A
>
> == Changelog ==
>
> === eclib-20071231 (John Cremona) ===
>
>  * renamed to eclib
>  * allows elliptic curves as input with rational (as opposed to just
> integer) coefficients.
>
> === cremona-20071219.p1 (Michael Abshoff) ===
>
>  * patch to fix "Internal error: can't free this _ntl_gbigint" (John
> Cremona)
>
> === cremona-20071219.p0 (John Cremona) ===
>
>  * fix main Makefile mismerge (Michael Abshoff)
>  * add missing export to g0n/Makefile (John Cremona)
>  * fix permission issue (Michael Abshoff)
>
> === cremona-20071219 (John Cremona) ===
>
>  * update to latest source
>  * fix mwrank error on non-minimal curves (#1233)
>
> === cremona-20071124.p4 (Michael Abshoff) ===
>
>  * apply John Cremoan's second patch for #1403
>  * delete $SAGE_LOCAL/include/mwrank (#1410)
>  * strip the mwrank binaries and link dynamically (#1410)
>  * delete $SAGE_LOCAL/lib/libmwrank.[so|dylib] (#1410)
>
> === cremona-20071124.p3 (Michael Abshoff) ===
>
>  * apply John Cremoan's patch for #1403
>  * fix #1256, i.e. remove the now obsolete mwrank.spkg
>
> === previous versions ===
>
>  * lost to history
> [end example]
>
> I pasted the verbatim text file into http://wiki.sagemath.org/spkg/eclib
>
> Is there anything missing? Should anything be removed?
>
> But now there are a couple issues we need to resolve:
>
> * How do we keep SPKG.txt and the wiki page in sync? In an ideal world
> we would just copy over the updated SPKG.txt into the wiki and be done
> with it. But people will edit the wiki page, i.e. to add contact info
> or correct issues. One way would be for the maintainers to subscribe
> to the pages of the spkgs they handle and sync it manually. Since the
> wiki preserves all edits and offers an interface to diff this should
> be relatively easy.
>
> * We currently have two couple pages in the wiki that list spkgs:
>
>  http://wiki.sagemath.org/standard_packages_available_for_SAGE
>  http://wiki.sagemath.org/Sage_Spkg_Tracking
>
> I think both should be merged into one page while preserving the info
> from both pages. "standard_packages_available_for_SAGE" is slightly
> older than "Sage_Spkg_Tracking", but I llike the format of
> "Sage_Spkg_Tracking" better. It also has all current components
> listed.
>
> * We would potentially have two wiki pages for each spkg. Take for
> example Givaro. We have a page at
>
>  http://wiki.sagemath.org/Givaro
>
> That page lists some examples and compares the performance of GF(2^8)
> to Magma. That information shouldn't be in SPKG.txt and the example
> section could potentially be expanded.
>
> The not yet existing page at
>
>  http://wiki.sagemath.org/spkg/Givaro
>
> on the other hand would then contain a much more technical changelog.
>
> I think that we also should merge both pages for each spkg into some
> part of the manual. It is possible to export wiki pages to latex which
> in turn then can be stuck into some part like the developer's manual.
> We should do that via some script so that prior to a release somebody
> can execute that script. If there is the need to do something manual
> it won't happen.
>
> Thought? Ideas?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Michael
> >
>


-- 
John Cremona

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to