On Jan 1, 1:05 pm, "John Cremona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael,
>
> I think we have some crossed wires again, presumably my fault as usual.

Nope, it was my fault in this case for sure. I just overflew your
message and misunderstood "The Sage interface to the library functions
for mwrank (etc) will need to be adapted to handle this." to mean
"adapted to use the extra functionality" implying "every that used to
work will keep working". I guess you need to be more direct as in
"Caution: this *breaks* the interface". Then there wouldn't be a doubt
in my mind that something needs to be fixed first ;)

> The spkg I posted yesterday, and also the slightly patched one you
> then made from it, build perfectly if you untar the spkg and cd into
> src then do make and make check.

I send you the details off-list, but I can reproduce the failure I
observed with your unchanged eclib-20071231.spkg.

> But despite having the spkg suffix
> on this I made no claims at all that this version would work with Sage
> 2.9.1!

:)

> In fact I said specifically that the Sage interface would need
> to change to take into account the changes I made in the
> mwarank->cremona->eclib migration.
>
> Hence no-one should be trying to use this withing Sage until the
> wrapping has been changed to match the (fairly minor) changes in
> interface between the last cremona* and the first eclib*.  These
> changes were only made to provide the extra functionality asked for by
> Sage users....

Well, by compiling the old cremona.spkg everything is back to normal
and works again.

> Happy New Year to all,

+1

> John

Cheers,

Michael
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to