> On 14/04/2021, at 16:52, Matthias Koeppe <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, April 13, 2021 at 9:45:19 PM UTC-7 François Bissey wrote:
>
> I guess right now I am just after sagemath-doc-src as defined on
> https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/29868
> although I am not excluding using sagemath-doc-html and sagemath-doc-pdf once
> they become available,
> especially for stable releases.
> But right now I am still doing stuff by source building.
>
> Also, I was expecting sagemath-standard to be a sdist for sagelib.
>
> No, for 9.3 please don't consider release tarballs on PyPI the project
> upstream.
> What I put on PyPI is experimental for Sage 9.3 (the READMEs on PyPI note
> this) and uses a few additional tickets which don't look like they'll make it
> into the 9.3 release. See https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/29705 for more
> information.
>
> I noticed a few differences,
> most notably the use of a file called `sage_setup/setenv.py`. I cannot find
> it anywhere else but
> that pypi tarball. Is it something that disappeared in 9.3rc3 or something
> that lives somewhere else?
>
>
> See above; this one is from ticket https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31338
> (needs review).
>
Just to be clear, I am not going to release a sage-on-gentoo 9.3 out of those.
I am playing around to see what it will looks like. I like planning ahead and
frankly, with some of the stuff that has been going on around me, that’s
literally
a way to relax.
I might want to give #31338 some distro love because there are reasons why that
file
was suddenly on my radar. Bonus point if you figure out why before I explain it
:)
François
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/BA418278-95C1-432E-9B73-76B3C96E1E39%40gmail.com.
